New Jersey Employment Discrimination Lawyers

employment lawyers nj

Discrimination Lawyer NJ

Unfortunately, discrimination in the workplace remains a fact of life even in the 21st century. This is true despite the existence of laws against discrimination.  There is an increasing number of lawsuits brought on behalf of employees here in New Jersey. This is in addition to the many employment discrimination suits brought around the country as well.  

While discrimination in the workplace continues, there is rarely “smoking gun” evidence of its existence. Instead, discrimination often takes more subtle forms. There is rarely a paper trail. In order to succeed in an employment discrimination case, you need the right attorney. Your best option is to find an employment lawyer with a proven track record of winning employment discrimination cases.  At Schall & Barasch, we have years of experience working with discrimination cases and all employment law cases. If you’ve been discriminated against at work, we would ask that you click the link, “Contact Us” on this website and proceed to fill out our questionnaire.  We will review it and typically get back to you within 24 hours.  Or, you may give us a call today at 856-914-9200.

The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination makes it illegal for an employer to discriminate against an employee. The law prohibits discrimination to occur on the basis of any of the following:

The law also makes it illegal to discriminate on the basis of genetics. This prevents an employer from considering or testing for an employee's genetic information. Genetic information of this kind includes an atypical hereditary, cellular, or blood trait.

There are advantages to bringing an employment discrimination suit in New Jersey. Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, there is no requirement for employees to first file with the EEOC. This is in contrast with the federal anti-discrimination laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. 

Instead, the employee has the right to proceed directly into state court as long as the employee files the lawsuit within the two year statute of limitations. Unlike the federal civil rights laws that place limits on recoverable damages, The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination places no limits on damages a plaintiff can recover in a discrimination lawsuit.

New Jersey residents are protected from discrimination at work. There are several different forms that workplace discrimination can take on. This means there are numerous ways an employee can maintain a claim under the law.


Some common examples of job discrimination might include but are not limited to:

  • sexual or racial harassment
  • unlawful termination as a result of retaliation
  • denial of promotion based on race, sex, or other factors

Unfortunately, just because an employer treats employees poorly does not necessarily make a work environment “hostile.”  However, if environment has been made hostile on account of the employee’s race, sex, disability etc., then there is likely a case.   

A hostile work environment occurs when a behavior in the workplace is so offensive, severe, and reoccurring that it creates an abusive or intimidating environment for an employee. The behavior also results in a change in the terms and conditions of the victim’s employment. 

There is no set list or formula of what constitutes a hostile work environment, as it can be a subjective term. Courts must assess several factors in determining if the environment is, in fact, hostile. 

These factors include:

  • whether or not the conduct interferes with the work performance of the employee;
  • is humiliating or threatening;
  • how often the conduct occurs. 

Some more common examples of harassment include:

Inappropriate or offensive conduct does not need to come directly from a superior in the workplace to be a hostile work environment. It can come from anyone from a co-worker to an intern to a supervisor of another division. Employers have a responsibility to protect their employees from harassment despite who it comes from.

Discrimination in the Workplace

Some employers have attempted to drastically shorten the statute of limitations. This is despite the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination which allows employees two years. They do this by sneaking language into employment applications. The ability of employers to do so came before the New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture. 

On behalf of the New Jersey chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association, our firm filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief with the Court, arguing that New Jersey employers should not be allowed to get away with such maneuvers. We are pleased to report that the Supreme Court agreed with us and has now outlawed the ability of employers to shorten the two-year statute of limitations that exists under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination.

In our brief to the New Jersey Supreme Court, we wrote:

[This Court should not] allow employers to utilize employment applications as a tool to lure employment applicants – those who are anxiously focused on finding a new job, and not on the legalese in an application – to waive their right to petition the court for redress up to two years after suffering a discriminatory act. In other words, a key facet of New Jersey’s civil rights laws protecting workers from discrimination and retaliation would now be subject to unilateral revision by any employer in this State via the use of contracts of adhesion. The opinion below has been described as a “game-changer,” an “opportunity” for an “employer to choose its own limitation period” and “a decision that affects every employer and employee in the state” by commentators. Before the “game is changed,” this Court should grant Certification in order to review whether the Law Against Discrimination statute of limitations can be lawfully truncated through such adhesion contracts.

The Fight Against Forced Arbitration

Here in New Jersey and all around the country, employers are increasing their use of forced arbitration agreements. They do this to compel employees to give up their right to a trial by jury in discrimination cases. Instead, they would be limited to private, secret arbitration proceedings. In this case, the deck is typically stacked against them. 

Employers impose forced arbitration agreements on employees by hiding them in employment applications.  or by insisting that current employees sign them as a condition of keeping their jobs. 

At Schall & Barasch, our firm has been among the leaders in New Jersey fighting to hold back the tide against these agreements. In the case of Dugan v. Best Buy, we were able to get the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey to strike down Best Buy’s forced arbitration policy. 

Contact Experienced New Jersey Employment Discrimination Lawyers

Attorneys Richard Schall and Patricia Barasch have more than 50 years combined experience representing employees. We have seen every type of NJ wrongful termination case. This includes many complex employment discrimination cases. We enjoy the challenge of tackling the most complex legal issues. We take on the biggest corporations in New Jersey, and stand up for the rights of our clients.

Have you faced discrimination in the workplace? Was it on the basis of your race/national origin, age, gender, disability, sexual orientation, or religion? Contact our firm by clicking on the link below, “Submit Your Case” and completing the online questionnaire.

What Our Clients Say

Much gratitude to Schall & Barasch for outstanding representation in my Equal Pay Act case - for their willingness and courage to pursue justice against the State and its limitless resources. Their legal skills are unmatched. Besides an expert knowledge of employment law, they have the fortitude and determination required for years of intense litigation. Richard and Patricia remain unwavering and always professional in the face of highly contentious litigation.

Theresa Hubal

News & Resources


Richard Schall agues against forced arbitration before the New Jersey Supreme Court

New Jersey employment law forms